Why do SPACE-RAY use Calorised Emitter tubes? The comparison tables below show the relative merits of emitter tube materials.
| Tube
Material |
Internal
Absorptivity |
External
Emissivity |
Radiation
Performance |
Corrosion
Resistance |
|
INTERNAL |
EXTERNAL |
||||
| Calorised |
Very Good |
Very Good (0.86) |
Very Good |
Excellent |
Excellent |
| Stainless
Steel |
Very Poor |
Very Poor (0.20-0.25) |
Very Poor |
Excellent |
Excellent |
| Stainless
Steel Painted |
Very Poor |
Very Good (0.85) |
Average |
Excellent |
Excellent |
| Aluminised
Steel |
Very Poor |
Poor (0.25-0.30) |
Very Poor |
Good |
Good |
| Aluminised
Steel Painted |
Very Poor |
Very Good (0.80) |
Good |
Very Good |
Very Good |
| Mild Steel
(Hot Rolled) |
Average |
Average (0.66) |
Average |
Poor |
Poor |
| Mild Steel
Painted |
Average |
Good (0.75) |
Good |
Poor |
Average |
| Tube
Material |
Peeling
and Flaking Resistance |
Scratch
Resistance |
Site
Time to Clean & Paint Each Tube |
|
At Burner |
Downstream |
|||
| Calorised |
Excellent |
Excellent |
Very Good |
n/a |
| Stainless
Steel |
Excellent |
Excellent |
n/a |
n/a |
| Stainless
Steel Painted |
Poor |
Average |
Extremely Poor |
15 Minutes |
| Aluminised
Steel |
Good |
Good |
Good |
n/a |
| Aluminised
Steel Painted |
Poor |
Average |
Poor |
15 Minutes |
| Mild Steel
(Hot Rolled) |
Poor |
Average |
n/a |
n/a |
| Mild Steel
Painted |
Poor |
Average |
Extremely Poor |
20 Minutes |